Accéder directement au contenu Accéder directement à la navigation
Nouvelle interface
Article dans une revue

The illusion of oil return predictability: The choice of data matters!

Abstract : Previous studies document statistically significant evidence of crude oil return predictability by several forecasting variables. We suggest that this evidence is misleading and follows from the common use of within-month averages of daily oil prices in calculating returns used in predictive regressions. Averaging introduces a bias in the estimates of the first-order autocorrelation coefficient and variance of returns. Consequently, estimates of regression coefficients are inefficient and associated t-statistics are overstated, leading to false inference about the true extent of in-sample and out-of-sample return predictability. On the contrary, using end-of-month data, we do not find convincing evidence for the predictability of oil returns. Our results highlight and provide a cautionary tale on how the choice of data could influence hypothesis testing for return predictability.
Type de document :
Article dans une revue
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://hal-rennes-sb.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03519860
Contributeur : Elise BOUVET Connectez-vous pour contacter le contributeur
Soumis le : lundi 10 janvier 2022 - 16:57:22
Dernière modification le : samedi 6 août 2022 - 03:22:31

Identifiants

Collections

Citation

Thomas Conlon, John Cotter, Emmanuel Eyiah-Donkor. The illusion of oil return predictability: The choice of data matters!. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2022, 134, pp.106331. ⟨10.1016/j.jbankfin.2021.106331⟩. ⟨hal-03519860⟩

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

18