Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Navigating multiple logics: Legitimacy and the quest for societal impact in science

Abstract : Academic scientists are encouraged to pursue research that delivers both scientific and societal impact. This may involve a search for alternative mechanisms of social approval which lead to endorsement of scientists’ research goals. We explore how scientists mobilise and accumulate different forms of legitimacy, which might favour their participation in practices related to innovation and societal impact. We propose three specific sources of scientific legitimacy: i) scientists’ social networks (research-related legitimacy ties), ii) prominence in the relevant academic community (reputation-based legitimacy); and direct contact with the primary beneficiaries of the research (beneficiary-based legitimacy). To explain scientists’ participation in activities oriented towards innovation and societal impact, we test the significance of each of these sources of legitimacy and their potential interplay empirically, using a large sample of Spanish biomedical scientists.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata

https://hal-rennes-sb.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03604173
Contributor : Isabelle Robert Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Thursday, March 10, 2022 - 11:49:47 AM
Last modification on : Wednesday, September 7, 2022 - 1:46:04 PM

Links full text

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

Oscar Llopis, Pablo d'Este, Maureen Mckelvey, Alfredo Yegros. Navigating multiple logics: Legitimacy and the quest for societal impact in science. Technovation, Elsevier, 2022, 110, pp.102367. ⟨10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102367⟩. ⟨hal-03604173⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

7